Understanding Hybrid Publishing…
Your path to publication
The publishing landscape has been undergoing a fascinating transformation for a number of years now, bringing with it a whole new range of publishing options available to authors. Where once there was only the traditional option to publish, now many options exist. We've already looked at traditional publishing and self-publishing — so in this edition, we're turning to the option that sits between the two: Hybrid Publishing.
THE MIDDLE GROUND OF PUBLISHING…
For a long time, authors faced a stark choice: hand the whole process over to a traditional publisher or take it all on themselves. Hybrid publishing has emerged
as a genuine third option, and it's one I get asked about more and more.
In a hybrid arrangement, you contribute to the cost of producing your book —
think editing, design, typesetting, production — while the publisher brings the professional infrastructure: vetting, editorial oversight, their own imprint, and a strategic approach to distribution. In exchange, you keep a far bigger slice of the royalties than a traditional deal would ever offer, often 70-90% or more of net.
When done right, it is a genuine partnership rather than a transaction. The publisher has skin in the game too — a book that sells well reflects on them, and most take a modest percentage of royalties to recoup the time and expertise they've invested. Because of that, it's very much in their interest to only take on books they believe in and produce them well.
WHAT DO WE THINK WE KNOW ABOUT HYBRID publishing?
"Hybrid" is just a nice word for “vanity publishing” (Sometimes true, sometimes not. This is why you need to do your homework. Read more under ‘Let’s Dive Deeper’.)
If you pay them, they'll publish anything (Not for a genuine hybrid publisher. Reputable ones vet submissions just as carefully as a traditional house.)
You'll automatically make more money than you would traditionally (Generally true on a per-copy basis, given the higher royalty rate, but not "automatically". It depends on reach and distribution etc.)
A hybrid publisher will handle your marketing for you (Rarely to the extent authors expect. This is consistently one of the biggest sources of disappointment for authors who publish with hybrid publishers.)
Going hybrid means you tried and failed at traditional publishing (Not necessarily. Plenty of authors go straight to hybrid by choice, and never query an agent or traditional publisher at all. It is a growing market.)
LET'S DIVE DEEPER…
”Hybrid" has become a fashionable word of late, and often provides a good cover for those who have not earned the label. Some presses borrow the label because it sounds better than "self-publishing" or because they want to sidestep the vanity tag. The Independent Book Publishers Association (IBPA) has put together a set of standards to help authors tell a genuine hybrid publisher from one borrowing the label. While none of it is enforceable, it's a solid checklist to hold a prospective publisher against.
A hybrid publisher, by IBPA's definition, will:
Have a defined mission and vision for what it publishes.
Vet submissions, rather than accepting everything that lands in the inbox.
Publish under its own imprint and ISBNs, as a true publishing house.
Meet the same production standards as a traditionally published book.
Take responsibility for professional editing, design, and production.
Pursue and manage a range of publishing rights across print, digital, and beyond.
Have a genuine, strategic distribution approach.
Show a track record of respectable sales for its niche.
Pay authors a genuinely higher-than-standard royalty — generally more than 50% of net.
I'd encourage you to hold any "hybrid" publisher you're considering against this list.
PROS AND CONS OF HYBRID PUBLISHING
Let's start with some pros…
Control: You retain more creative control (more say over your title, cover, and manuscript) than a traditional deal would allow.
Higher royalties: Typically 70-90% of net, well above the 5–15% you'd see from a traditional house.
Professional standard: A genuine hybrid publisher edits, designs, and produces your book to the same standard as a traditional one.
Traditional-style distribution: Reputable hybrids have real distribution relationships, which is one of the harder things to replicate as a fully independent author.
A faster, more collaborative process: Timelines are usually shorter than traditional publishing, and you're generally dealing with an actual person who you build a relationship with, rather than just being another cog in a wheel at a larger traditional publishing house.
And now to the cons…
Upfront investment: You're contributing to production costs, which can be a significant outlay before you've sold a single copy.
Costs that creep: The price at "check-out" is sometimes higher than the one you were quoted at signing, this isn’t necessarily through any improper manoeuvres, but because as a first-time hybrid author, you don't always know what else you'll need.
Variable quality: Because the term isn't protected, standards swing wildly between presses.
Marketing expectations: Most hybrids won't run your publicity and marketing campaign for you, even though many authors go in expecting otherwise.
Smaller-than-hoped sales: As with any publishing model, there's no guarantee of the sales an author is hoping for, hybrid fee or not.
CHOOSING THE RIGHT HYBRID PUBLISHER…
Beyond the IBPA checklist, here are the practical questions worth asking before you sign anything:
How long have they been operating, and how many titles do they publish a year?
Is it a fixed package, tiered packages, or a customisable menu, and does it cover everything through to distribution, or will extras be added?
What does "vetting" actually mean for the publisher? Do they genuinely decline manuscripts, or take almost every submission?
What does their distribution look like in practice? It is important that you understand what this means, upfront.
What's the realistic timeline, and is there a waiting list?
Can you find reviews, awards, or testimonials from their existing authors? Better still, can you get your hands on one of their finished books to judge the quality yourself?
Not all publishing deals will look the same. Some might offer online distribution only, but might put more work into the marketing experience. When you consider the opportunity, it is important to consider this as a bigger picture.
FINALLY…
Hybrid publishing exemplifies author empowerment. It offers a genuine middle path, and a real sense of partnership that neither the fully traditional nor the fully solo route quite gives you. But because the term is used so loosely, the onus is on the author to do the homework: check a prospective publisher against the IBPA standards, ask the hard questions about cost and distribution before you sign, and talk to authors who've already been through the process with them.
Whichever path you choose — traditional, self-published, or hybrid — the manuscript itself is what carries you through it. A strong developmental foundation matters just as much before you approach a hybrid publisher as it does before querying an agent; vetting works both ways, and a manuscript that's had a professional appraisal and edit behind it is simply a stronger candidate, on any path.
That's the piece we help with, regardless of which route you're weighing up. If you'd like a second opinion on where your manuscript stands before you start approaching publishers of any kind, Manuscript Appraisal Agency has been doing exactly that since 1996 — one of the first services of its kind in Australia, and still going strong.
Happy publishing!
Read more about publishing…